![Quirijn Meijnen advocaat: Leopold Meijnen Oosterbaan advocaten: Adidas A.G. vs OHIM and Shoe Branding Europe BVBA Decision General Court 21 May 2015 Case T‑145/14, three stripes and third time lucky Quirijn Meijnen advocaat: Leopold Meijnen Oosterbaan advocaten: Adidas A.G. vs OHIM and Shoe Branding Europe BVBA Decision General Court 21 May 2015 Case T‑145/14, three stripes and third time lucky](http://4.bp.blogspot.com/-YsVXCu8S0MI/VWWlXSYcNuI/AAAAAAAAGrw/bPSoLGbcgzI/s1600/Adidas-logo-Wallpaper-29.jpg)
Quirijn Meijnen advocaat: Leopold Meijnen Oosterbaan advocaten: Adidas A.G. vs OHIM and Shoe Branding Europe BVBA Decision General Court 21 May 2015 Case T‑145/14, three stripes and third time lucky
![Urteil in den Rechtssachen T-85/16 und T-629/16 Shoe Branding Europe BVBA / EUIPO › Kanzlei Hoefer & Partner Urteil in den Rechtssachen T-85/16 und T-629/16 Shoe Branding Europe BVBA / EUIPO › Kanzlei Hoefer & Partner](https://www.hoefer-pat.de/wp-content/uploads/2018/03/schuhe.png)
Urteil in den Rechtssachen T-85/16 und T-629/16 Shoe Branding Europe BVBA / EUIPO › Kanzlei Hoefer & Partner
![Adidas AG vs Shoe Branding Europe, o la protección de las marcas renombradas y notorias - Enrique Ortega Burgos Adidas AG vs Shoe Branding Europe, o la protección de las marcas renombradas y notorias - Enrique Ortega Burgos](https://enriqueortegaburgos.com/wp-content/uploads/2018/11/adidas.jpg)
Adidas AG vs Shoe Branding Europe, o la protección de las marcas renombradas y notorias - Enrique Ortega Burgos
![EuG: Nichtigkeit einer Unionsmarke von adidas, die aus drei parallelen Streifen besteht. | Gottschalk Maiwald Patentanwalts- und Rechtsanwalts- (Schweiz) GmbH | Splügenstrasse 8, CH-8002 Zürich EuG: Nichtigkeit einer Unionsmarke von adidas, die aus drei parallelen Streifen besteht. | Gottschalk Maiwald Patentanwalts- und Rechtsanwalts- (Schweiz) GmbH | Splügenstrasse 8, CH-8002 Zürich](https://gmplegal.ch/wp-content/uploads/2020/04/adidas-streifen-300x300.jpg)
EuG: Nichtigkeit einer Unionsmarke von adidas, die aus drei parallelen Streifen besteht. | Gottschalk Maiwald Patentanwalts- und Rechtsanwalts- (Schweiz) GmbH | Splügenstrasse 8, CH-8002 Zürich
![Hong Kong: A blow to the giant – Adidas loses trademark battle against Shoe Branding Europe BVBA - Asia Law Network Blog Hong Kong: A blow to the giant – Adidas loses trademark battle against Shoe Branding Europe BVBA - Asia Law Network Blog](https://learn.asialawnetwork.com/wp-content/uploads/2019/08/adidas.jpeg)
Hong Kong: A blow to the giant – Adidas loses trademark battle against Shoe Branding Europe BVBA - Asia Law Network Blog
![Wrong side of the line - more absolute grounds rejections for stripe marks of K-Swiss Inc and Shoe Branding Europe BVBA - IP Whiteboard Wrong side of the line - more absolute grounds rejections for stripe marks of K-Swiss Inc and Shoe Branding Europe BVBA - IP Whiteboard](http://ipwhiteboard.com.au/wp-content/uploads/2016/01/K-Swiss-5-stripe-CTM.png)
Wrong side of the line - more absolute grounds rejections for stripe marks of K-Swiss Inc and Shoe Branding Europe BVBA - IP Whiteboard
![Adidas AG vs. Shoe Branding Europe BVBA T‑307/17 - Judgement of the General Court (Ninth Chamber, Extended Composition) of June 19, 2019, Ninth ECLI:EU:T:2019:427 - Lexology Adidas AG vs. Shoe Branding Europe BVBA T‑307/17 - Judgement of the General Court (Ninth Chamber, Extended Composition) of June 19, 2019, Ninth ECLI:EU:T:2019:427 - Lexology](https://d2dzik4ii1e1u6.cloudfront.net/images/lexology/firm/new/b81e625d-30da-413a-95c1-1ba298bd7068/W350/20190206092555.png)